Posted by egabriel in History of Magic.
Tags: acts, arts, astrologers, attitude, author, books, charms, claims, consensus, crops, edicts, emperors, forms, history, humanity, knowledge, law, laws, magic, magicians, practicing, recipes, sorcerers, spells, teachers, traditions, violation
Thus, by acquiring knowledge one can aspire to gain knowledge even from the gods. Yet, even the author of Natural History Pliny, the Elder thought negatively of magic. He wrote that the claims of the professional magicians were either exaggerated or simply false. And those sorcerers who had written down their spells and recipes despised and hated humanity. Arts of the magicians of Rome were linked with the emperor Nero, whom Pliny claims had studied magic with the best teachers and had access to the best books, but was unable to do anything extraordinary.
Overall, attitude towards magic was extremely hostile in Roman empire. Practicing magic was outlawed under Roman law. It was very easy for a philosopher to be accused of magical practices. A consensus was established quite early in Roman history for the banning of anything viewed as harmful acts of magic. The Laws of the Twelve Tablets for example expressly forbid anyone from enticing his neighbors’ crops into his fields by magic. Actual trials for alleged violation of these laws were held in Rome many times. It is also recorded that Chaldean astrologers were expelled from Rome in 139 BC – on the grounds that they were magicians. In 33 BC astrologers and magicians are explicitly mentioned as having been driven from Rome.
Twenty years later, Augustus ordered all books on the magical arts to be burned. In 16 CE magicians and astrologers were expelled from Italy, and this was reinstated by edicts of emperors Vespasian in 69 CE and Domitian in 89 CE. The emperor Constantine I in the 4th century CE issued a ruling to cover all charges of magic. In it he distinguished between helpful charms, not punishable, and antagonistic spells. In these cases Roman authorities specifically decided what forms of magic were acceptable and which were not. Those that were not acceptable were termed “magic”; those that were acceptable were usually defined as traditions of the state or practices of the state’s religions.
Posted by egabriel in History of Magic.
Tags: audience, claims, concept, constellation, controlling, cosmos, destruction, future, hating, horrors, influencing, knowledge, magic, magical, power, practices, spells, texts, version, witch, witchcraft, works
In Seneca’s version Medea’s power of hating, which she can switch on and intensify at will is still the dominant theme, but Medea is now given a full cupboard of horrors from which to select the most efficient means of magical destruction. Her magic can even, apparently affect the cosmos, as she claims that she can force down the constellation of the Snake.
Seneca’s nephew Lucan in his work surpassed his uncle in portraying the horrors and powers of witchcraft. In his play, just before the decisive battle of Pharsalus, in which Julius Caesar defeats the forces of Pompey, the two armies are moving through Thessaly, the country of witchcraft in Lucan’s work. Here one of Pompey’s sons consults a famous witch called Erictho about the outcome of the future battle. Erictho is the most powerful of witches, and because she is so powerful she is presented as being quite loathsome and disgusting. Such are her powers that she can even compel some of the lesser gods to serve her and even cause them to shudder at her spells. As exaggerated as these plays are they demonstrate knowledge of magical practices found in the Greek magical texts. These works also shows that Roman audience must have easily understood the concept of magic in a negative sense but also in the sense of being a practice aimed at influencing or controlling the forces of the cosmos, even the gods themselves.
Beyond Your Imagination 